On 2010-11-26 09:12:53 -0500, Jens Mueller <jens.k.muel...@gmx.de> said:

So how do you like it to be?
void foo(const(int)*, char *, const(float)*);
or
void foo(const int*, char *, const float*);

I still like the fixed original one namely
void foo(const(int)*, char *, const float*);

I don't really have a preference. Note that for function arguments, you can also use 'in' to mean const:

        void foo(in int*, char *, in float*);

My opinion is that we have too much choice. When everyone can write the same thing differently it can easily become confusing.


--
Michel Fortin
michel.for...@michelf.com
http://michelf.com/

Reply via email to