Trass3r wrote: > >I don't really have a preference. Note that for function > >arguments, you can also use 'in' to mean const: > > > > void foo(in int*, char *, in float*); > > Isn't "in" the default (even if nothing is specified)?
I don't know. I never read this. I don't think that's the case. For example void foo(in int a) { //a = 1; // won't compile } Whereas void foo(int a) { a = 1; // this compiles } compiles. So in is definitely not the default. Jens