On 12/9/10 12:25 PM, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
so <s...@so.do> wrote:
Hello!
In D, it is much harder to say something is impossible to implement
comparing to other languages.
If you are coming from C/C++ land, you should know that if you want to
script your program,
you are going to fall back to another language, possibly a "scripting"
language.
But why? why should i fall back to a dummy language for this? Tons of
workarounds to export stuff, it is just a mess!
It doesn't matter if we have tools like boost python bindings or PyD,
it is still ugly.
All i can see right now is the lack of compile(file, module
dependencies, ...).
Is it just technical limitations or is this is another religious issue?
Mostly, there is no D compiler written in D that can be included in the
standard library.
A system() call should work as well. A larger problem is dynamically
executing functions that have just been compiled.
Andrei
