Stephan Soller <stephan.sol...@helionweb.de> wrote:
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5].select((int e){ return e > 3; })
.collect((int e){ return e*e; });
It's already fairly compact. The main overhead is the parameter type and
the return statement. I don't believe this can be reduced any more
without breaking consistency of the language.
The delegates can be passed by alias parameter, and then be written
without the parameter type:
@property void bar(alias t)() {
t(3);
}
void main() {
bar!((e){writeln(e);});
}
--
Simen
