spir wrote: > On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 22:44:04 +0100 > "Jérôme M. Berger" <jeber...@free.fr> wrote: > >>> 8. direct interface to C >> Cython gives it too: it is as easy to write a Cython interface >> module as to write a D interface file for a C library. > > Hum, I do not agree at all. As I see it, D binds to C directly, Lua binds to > C rather easily, Python binds to C "complicatedly". (Lua's C interface layer > is far simpler than Python's, but it still cannot compare to D's direct calls > in both directions. The only issue AFAIK is that types, qualifiers and > conventions do not exactly match.) >
cdef extern double fooC (int bar)
def fooPy (bar):
return fooC (bar)
I don't know how Lua binds to C, but I doubt it is any easier. Or
you could use swig which is even easier.
Jerome
--
mailto:jeber...@free.fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeber...@jabber.fr
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
