On 2011-01-20 10:19, Gour wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:40:49 +0100
Jacob Carlborg<d...@me.com>  wrote:

1. it uses python, yet another dependency

True, but it brings more features over e.g. cmake 'cause you have full
language on disposal.

I would go with a tool that uses a dynamic language as a DSL. I'm assuming you can embed the the dynamic language completely without the need for external dependencies.

2. it seems complicated

Well, build systems are complex... ;)


Sincerely,
Gour

Hm, right. I was actually kind of thinking about a build tool, not a package system/tool. But it seemed complex anyway, it should be able to be quite simple.

--
/Jacob Carlborg

Reply via email to