On 2011-01-20 10:19, Gour wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:40:49 +0100
Jacob Carlborg<d...@me.com> wrote:
1. it uses python, yet another dependency
True, but it brings more features over e.g. cmake 'cause you have full
language on disposal.
I would go with a tool that uses a dynamic language as a DSL. I'm
assuming you can embed the the dynamic language completely without the
need for external dependencies.
2. it seems complicated
Well, build systems are complex... ;)
Sincerely,
Gour
Hm, right. I was actually kind of thinking about a build tool, not a
package system/tool. But it seemed complex anyway, it should be able to
be quite simple.
--
/Jacob Carlborg