Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote: > > Ever since I worked with STL, I fell in love with > names_with_underscores. I can't explain it, but my feeling is that code > using that convention is calm and levelheaded. Camel case forces me to > think of one-word names because at the second word some beauty is > already lost; never felt the same with the underscores.
I like the look of the STL convention, but overall prefer that Camel case distinguishes between types and values. It completely eliminates the need for a "_type" suffix in STL-style typedefs, for one.