On 01/23/2011 12:40 AM, so wrote:
Yes, I'm absolutely in agreement with the naming (and thrilled too). I imagine a putative user looking through std.algorithm ("let's see... what find functions are out there?"). That makes findPieces easy to get to, whereas "trisect" would be oddly situated in the alphabetic list and oddly named enough to be virtually undiscoverable.If this is the reasoning. This is a split function, not a find. There will be a few more of these split functions i suppose and this is the reason of my proposal splitAt. It is in the definition of the function you quoted. "(Split) the string (at) the first occurrence of (sep)"
>
splitAt(string, sep)
+++ splitAt is simply a Good Name! (even better than "tripartite" ;-) Also for finding it in list of funcs. Denis _________________ vita es estrany spir.wikidot.com
