Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 23.01.2011 23:55, Walter Bright wrote:
Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
If the D becomes common used language we can "examine" its new
features and take in into consideration. But... Maybe is's easier to
contact with D developer and ask for new features in objects.
If the author wants to email me with any specific questions, I'd be
happy to help him.
Yeah, that's the problem, I suppose he would not bother with D support
himself unless someone proves it's usefulness. It's more like we need a
little help not the other way around.
Well, anyway I can mail him and hope that he will do it just out of
curiosity, what's yours relevant email then?
May I just as well tell him that you are interested in it or anything?
First off, there are no D extensions to the OMF. There was an extension added
around 1993 or so to support long identifier names. There were also a couple
extensions to the codeview debug format, which are documented in the ABI.
My offer is if there is something specific about the OMF files generated that I
can explain to him, I'd be happy to do so. My mail is walter followed by
digitalmars.com.
