== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article > foobar wrote: > > ATM, Phobos ranks extremely poorly in this regard. Far worse than C++ which > > is by far one of worst ever. both Java and C# are surprisingly high on this > > list and are behind various "new-age" scripting languages such as python and > > Ruby and languages that were designed to be readable by humans such as > > Smalltalk. > I think you've mixed up libraries with languages. Please rephrase so we know > what you're referring to and give specifics.
Seconded. Also there is this one presupposition that reflects poorly on foobar's argument: that choosing foobar's preferred convention inherently makes the code more accessible. In fact, a stronger argument could be made to the contrary as we're talking about a maximum and 80 < 120. Andrei from the ER
