Michel Fortin Wrote: > On 2011-01-31 02:18:26 -0500, foobar <f...@bar.com> said: > > > Phobos is a very good product that I for one will never use. Just > > looking at the one huge page for algorithms is enough to discourage > > many people. > > But is Phobos the problem or is the one-page-per-module documentation > the problem? > > -- > Michel Fortin > michel.for...@michelf.com > http://michelf.com/ >
Phobos' organization is the problem. If you read the C++ standard you'll see that their description of the stdlib describes <algorithm> as a library. Hence, c++'s design is a single file per library. Phobos does exactly the same mistake. D has a far superior module system that doesn't require this moronic design. Please let's use it. I have a hard time believing that having a separate doc page per function is a better solution than to properly organize the code.
