On 2/2/11 9:08 AM, Adam Ruppe wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
There are two tables, one with just the names and the other with
names and a brief description. Let me know of any feedback.
Thanks!
Did you decide on a manually maintained table or is it auto
generated? I do really think adding a Tags: section, or perhaps just
putting groups under the See_Also: section is a good way to do the
grouping.
For now it's manual; I had to write the actual text which was the bulk
anyway. Long term we'll need to look at generating the table by adding
category tags to each function/class etc.
The mini examples might be good as a new section too, one that can be
hidden in the big docs, but available to the jump table.
Not getting this.
Also a few notes:
a) I really like a fixed width for the links, so it forms a neat
grid. My eyes just see a blob of links when it's a list...
That would really hurt e.g. set operations.
b) The<a name=""> anchors in the page are repeated in a lot of
cases, meaning the links may go to the wrong place. I suggest
tweaking ddoc to make them fully qualified (at least inside the
module, for example, "#OpenRight.yes" instead of "#yes").
Yah, how did you pull that trick in your generated jump table?
c) I think I agree with the others that the Category header eats a
bit too much horizontal space, but it isn't a big deal to me.
I'll probably change that.
I'm working on my own little tweaks to the system concurrently. I
like your version a lot more than mine right now, but still think we
can do a little better... if I have time today in between my other
work, I'll see about adding my ideas here to my version so you can
see them in practice.
Awesome!
Andrei
