Am 02.02.2011 23:59, schrieb Andrej Mitrovic: > But what about structs/classes/functions/etc which are partially > implemented, but still unusable? Marking them with deprecated doesn't > make sense, as this will likely confuse both the user and the library > writers. Would it be overkill to introduce a new attribute? > What about version( comming_soon) ? :-)
- Should we have an Unimplemented Attribute? Andrej Mitrovic
- Re: Should we have an Unimplemented Attribute? Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Should we have an Unimplemented Attribute? Andrej Mitrovic
- Re: Should we have an Unimplemented Attribut... Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Should we have an Unimplemented Attribut... Simen kjaeraas
- Re: Should we have an Unimplemented Attr... Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Should we have an Unimplemented... Andrej Mitrovic
- Re: Should we have an Unimplemented Attribute? Iain Buclaw
- Re: Should we have an Unimplemented Attribut... Andrej Mitrovic
- Re: Should we have an Unimplemented Attr... Andrej Mitrovic
- Re: Should we have an Unimplemented Attribute? Gerrit Wichert
- Re: Should we have an Unimplemented Attribute? Andrej Mitrovic
- Re: Should we have an Unimplemented Attribut... Andrej Mitrovic
- Re: Should we have an Unimplemented Attr... Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Should we have an Unimplemented... Andrej Mitrovic
- Re: Should we have an Unimpleme... Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Should we have an Unimplemented Attribute? Piotr Szturmaj
- Re: Should we have an Unimplemented Attribute? Jacob Carlborg
- Re: Should we have an Unimplemented Attribut... Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Should we have an Unimplemented Attribute? KennyTM~