Andrei Alexandrescu napisał: > > I fear efficiency will get abstracted out. Say this is my internal buffer > > (pipes indicate front() slice): > > > > [ooo|oooooo|oo] > > > > Now I do appendToFront(3) -- how do you expose the expected front() without > > moving data? > > You do end up moving data, but proportionally little if the buffer is > large enough.
It still matters for frequent big munches. I'd like a minimum memory option if that's neccessary. -- Tomek
