On 02/07/2011 09:30 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
There are a number of people who have responded positively to my unit test
functions - including assertPred - as it has moved through the review process.
Please reiterate that positive vote here (or negative if you're so inclined).
The deadline for votes is today.
As it stands, I believe that assertThrown, assertNotThrown, and
collectExceptionMsg will clearly pass the vote, but it's not so clear if the
vote is in favor of assertPred. Going off just the votes in this thread, I
believe that it would be a tie as to whether assertPred made it in or not. But
if we took the votes for the group of functions as a whole from previous posts,
I believe that it would get in. It would be better though if such votes were
confirmed here - especially if the vote is close. I'd prefer not to have an
ambiguous vote.
So, please vote.
(dunno whether a newcomer like me is supposed to vote, but in case:
* assertThrown : +
* assertNotThrown : ?
* collectExceptionMsg : ?
* assertPred : -
I only really need something with semantic similars to asserThrown's. My
overall picture of asserts and unittests is different, anyway --as you know.
)
Denis
--
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com
