Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote: > On 2/11/11 7:07 AM, foobar wrote: > > Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote: > > > >> > >> I don't find the name "iota" stupid. > >> > >> Andrei > > > > Of course _you_ don't. However practically all the users _do_ find it > > poorly named, including other developers in the project.. This is the > > umpteenth time this comes up in the NG and incidentally this is the > > only reason I know what the function does. > > > > If the users think the name is stupid than it really is. That's how > > usability works and the fact the you think otherwise or that it might > > be more accurate mathematically is really not relevant. If you want > > D/Phobos to be used by other people besides yourself you need to > > cater for their requirements. > > Not all users dislike iota, and besides arguments ad populum are > fallacious. Iota rocks. But have at it - vote away, and I'll be glad if > a better name for iota comes about. > > Andrei
list(2, 8) line(2, 8) step(2, 8) sequence(2, 8) consecution(2, 8) gradate(2, 8) gradation(2, 8) progression(2, 8) row(2, 8)