Nick Sabalausky wrote: > "Nick Sabalausky" <a@a.a> wrote in message > news:ijesem$brd$1...@digitalmars.com... >> "Steven Schveighoffer" <schvei...@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:op.vqx78nkceav7ka@steve-laptop... >>> >>> size_t works, it has a precedent, it's already *there*, just use it, or >>> alias it if you don't like it. >>> >> >> One could make much the same argument about the whole of C++. It works, >> it has a precedent, it's already *there*, just use it. >> > > The whole reason I came to D was because, at the time, D was more > interested in fixing C++'s idiocy than just merely aping C++ as the theme > seems to be now.
I don't see any difference, D has always kept a strong link to it's C++ heritage. It's just a matter of what you define as idiocy.
