On 02/28/2011 03:55 PM, Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2011-02-28 09:34:30 -0500, spir <denis.s...@gmail.com> said:
So, let's use ':'.
Note however that ':' already has a meaning in templates arguments. Using ':'
for named function arguments would preclude having named template arguments (or
force template arguments to use yet another syntax).
Yes, I'm aware of that. This usage in fact conflicts with the general
"subtyping" semantics of ':'. But this conflict already exists with the usage
of ':' in dyn array notation, which is linguistically pretty close to a named
argument set; so...
Denis
--
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com
