On 02/28/2011 07:56 PM, bearophile wrote:
spir:
Yes, I'm aware of that. This usage in fact conflicts with the general
"subtyping" semantics of ':'. But this conflict already exists with the usage
of ':' in dyn array notation, which is linguistically pretty close to a named
argument set; so...
If I have understood what you mean here, then I think we'll just have to leave with
this small clash. An alternative solution is to use the Ada syntax: foo(x => 1,
y=>2) but it's a bit longer because it requires two chars instead of one.
Agreed, and I'm not for adding non-obvious "signs". D is not Perl. Or else use
':=' ?
Denis
--
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com
