On 03/08/2011 02:08 PM, Daniel Gibson wrote:
Am 08.03.2011 03:41, schrieb Caligo:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Bernard Helyer <b.hel...@gmail.com
<mailto:b.hel...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 20:03:36 +0000, filgood wrote:
> as described here:
>
> http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/TypeSystemRewrite.txt
>
> Btw, what is the status of the D2 LLVM compiler?
You're probably wondering about LDC2, but I'll chip in with SDC's
( https://github.com/bhelyer/SDC ) status here:
On the road to some kind of 0.1, but a lot of work to be done -- it
should land some time this year, however.
Keeping current with DMD releases, current with LLVM releases.
Do we really need another D compiler that doesn't work?
The more D compilers the better.
Assuming that it won't work is quite insulting IMHO.
In addition, the fact it is in D is a huge advatange. D desperately needs a
community lexer / parser / semantic analyser. Cannot be C++ stuff.
Denis
--
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com
