Am 17.03.2011 06:59, schrieb Simen kjaeraas:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 03:03:23 +0100, Daniel Gibson
<metalcae...@gmail.com> wrote:
You're right. I just realized it and wanted to reply that correction
to myself but you were faster :)
I agree, that *is* helpful.
A side note: The documentation says the value is returned if it's
"non-zero".
enforce() also throws on null (for classes, probably also for
pointers) and false (for bool..) - this should probably be mentioned
in the docs ;-)
null and false are also zero. :p
Technically yes, but it'd be more clear to specifically mention them.
Also "the value is returned" could imply that enforce doesn't work with
references (=> objects)..
I think enforce's behaviour on bools, objects and pointers would be
easier to understand if null and false were mentioned :)
