On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 20:44 +0000, Jason E. Aten wrote:
> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I observe that there doesn't appear
> to be a package management system / standard repository for D libraries.
> Or is there?
>
> I'm talking about something as easy to use as R's CRAN,
> > install.packages("rforest")
>
> or cpan for perl, ctan for latex, dpgk/apt for debian, cabal for Haskell/
> Hackage, etc.Note that every language-specific package manager conflicts directly with every operating system package manager. Thus RubyGems, CPAN, Cabal, Maven, Go, etc. conflicts with the package management of Debian, Fedora, SUSE, FreeBSD, MacPorts, etc. leading to pain. Pain leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering. > If there's not a commonly utilized one currently, perhaps we could > "borrow" cabal, with a trivial port. cabal is Haskell's package manager. > > Not only does having a standard package install system facilitate > adoption, it greatly facilitates code sharing and library maturation. At the expense of easy system administration. I guess the only up side of language specific package management is that it enables people whose operating systems are not package structured to do things sensibly. Alternatively Windows users could switch to a sensible operating system ;-) Given that D has chosen to switch to Git for version control, doesn't this imply that package management transported over DVCS is the way forward. Go has certainly taken this route. It prioritizes Mercurial but supports Bazaar and Git as well. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@russel.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
