Walter: > I have thought in the past about putting such modules into another package, > call > it "foo" for lack of a better name, and put it in the dmd distribution. If > the > package pans out in real life, then move it to std. So, yes, I think your > idea > is a good one.
It's a nice idea. Possible names: "std.experimental", "std.unstable" or "std.minefield" :-) In Python there is kind of built-in namespace named "future" that you import as module, it contains even new basic language features in testing (like integer division!). I'd like the same in D2 too, for experimental features. Bye, bearophile
