On 03/28/2011 09:32 PM, bearophile wrote:
Walter:
I have thought in the past about putting such modules into another package, call
it "foo" for lack of a better name, and put it in the dmd distribution. If the
package pans out in real life, then move it to std. So, yes, I think your idea
is a good one.
It's a nice idea. Possible names: "std.experimental", "std.unstable" or
"std.minefield" :-)
std.experimental is better than std.foo, because 'foo' is far too useful as
variable name ;-)
Denis
--
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com
