Cristi Cobzarenco wrote: > Again I will have to think some more about the latter point. And I'll do > some more tests on the performance of doing linear searches. Is there way to > get the name of a type (as a string) at compile time (not the mangled name > you get at runtime)? I wasn't able to find any way to do this. My original > idea was actually to use the fully qualified typenames to create the > ordering.
T.stringof where T is some type gives you the name of the type at compile time. Jens