Having written a D2 parser a few month ago in the hope it will be
helpful to Visual D (just finds it way into the plugin right now), I've
noticed quite some inaccuracies in the "official" grammar on the
website. Some of these are probably already in bugzilla, some of them
might be personal taste and should be discussed, though.
I've set up a comparison with some notes here:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/visuald/wiki/GrammarComparison
The parser was written manually, so the proposed grammar was not
directly used to generate the parser and might still contain errors.
I've extracted the website grammar using some combination of scripts
from the ddoc sources, so if there is interest, I can dig them up...
Rainer
Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/28/2011 9:02 AM, Luca Boasso wrote:
A complete D grammar is one of the objectives of my GSOC 2011 ANTLR
proposal, if I got accepted you will have one :)
The complete grammar should be part of the D spec. Please post any
errors/fixes to the existing one to bugzilla!
