== Quote from bearophile (bearophileh...@lycos.com)'s article > The operator overloading done with opCmp is too much coarse even if you want > to implement sets with operators like <= < > >= == for subset, etc.
Can you please give an example of where <=, >, etc. are useful for representing set operations? My naive opinion (i.e. without understanding your use case) is that using comparison operators to represent anything besides partial or total ordering is a severe abuse of operator overloading. (Their use to represent ordering of corresponding elements of a vector or matrix is a borderline case.)
