On Apr 11, 11 23:27, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
It looks like an awkward workaround for that feature called named
arguments.
Named arguments aren't a part of standard D now, nor does it look
likely they will be for many years.
We've gotta look at the here and now to make decisions; focus
on what we have rather than what we don't have.
Well the same argument was used to reject assertPred in favor of an
improved assert which we still don't have (issue 5547). (Though changing
assert's output doesn't change the D spec, while adding named arguments
do, and the D2 spec is frozen.)
