"Steven Schveighoffer" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > > On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:16:40 -0400, dsimcha <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If submitters are allowed to vote for themselves, of course >> they all >> will and their votes will effectively cancel out. I think it's best to >> give each >> submitter a meaningful vote as to what the best other article is. > ... > > On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:57:48 -0400, Nick Sabalausky <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So I have a proposal: Even if we are technically allowed to vote for >> ourselves, I propose that we all agree not to. With Steve and I in favor >> of >> this, that makes it 2 out of the 5 so far. So how about it, Jonathan, >> Dave >> and Robert? > > Given the above original post by David (which outlines a preference for > the same thing you stated), I think he's on board with this. Which means > we are all in agreement. >
Good point. So great, then :) Now watch us all end up voting for completely different people and cancel our votes out anyway ;)
