Andrei: > That's good evidence that introducing named parameters would be quite > involved.
It's also good evidence that Martin Odersky, one of the most intelligent language designers alive today, is willing to do a lot to support named arguments in his language :-) Probably implementing tuple unpacking syntax sugar too needs some not small changes, but they are well worth it (of those two features I think tuple unpacking syntax sugar is more important than named arguments). Anyway, in Scala this sub-feature isn't a custom language feature, it uses a general feature, annotations, that's used for several other purposes too. And I think C#4 doesn't have this sub-feature. Bye, bearophile
