== Quote from Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s article > What is the type of s.o? Hint, it can't be final, because final isn't part > of the type. > What is the type of &s.o? > If the type of s.o is T (let's say) and the type of &s.o is not T*, then I > think we have a problem. > I just think it doesn't work. Maybe you can figure out a way it can, but I > don't think it can be done without severe confusing semantics. > -Steve
Type of s.o: const(Object), like before. Can be reassigned. Type of &s.o: Pointer to a const(Object)... yeah I think I finally see. x_____x Gosh, that sucks... thanks for the explanation, I appreciate it. :) I'll see if I can figure out a way (though I doubt I can, lol)...
