> On 6/13/11 4:02 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: >> "Andrei Alexandrescu"<seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote in message >> news:it3ne2$1g2f$1...@digitalmars.com... >>> That actually does help, but not for enums used by more than one function. >>> The other issues remain too. >>> >> >> I would think that an enum used by more than one function *should* be listed >> separately. > > Actually, not necessarily, if the definition is self explanatory. By the > same argument a named argument with the same name and meaning in several > functions doesn't necessarily have to be defined separately. > > > Andrei
What about just not documenting the enum itself? This elegantly resolves the 'certain' vs. 'an' debate too :o). Timon