"Timon Gehr" <timon.g...@gmx.ch> wrote: > String mixins themselves are 'a little bit ugly' (but unquestionably very > useful). > I think the syntax should keep reflecting that. > > Your proposal is a try to make up for Ds lack of macros. I'd prefer > macros. > Also overloading the meaning of 'mixin template' seems to be questionable. > As I > understand it, your proposal would make code like this valid?: >
With Don's extension of CTFE and Kenji proposal it's possible to fully implement macroses in library. I've tried to do that earlier but it was impossible with current compiler state. I think it's GREAT idea. Thank Kenji for making it. I'm interested in implementing such macro library. Are there any instructions how to compile DMD under windows?
