My proposal is just a syntactic sugar. You can develop such library without it.
Kenji 2011/6/25 Alex_Dovhal <alex_dov...@yahoo.com>: > "Timon Gehr" <timon.g...@gmx.ch> wrote: >> String mixins themselves are 'a little bit ugly' (but unquestionably very >> useful). >> I think the syntax should keep reflecting that. >> >> Your proposal is a try to make up for Ds lack of macros. I'd prefer >> macros. >> Also overloading the meaning of 'mixin template' seems to be questionable. >> As I >> understand it, your proposal would make code like this valid?: >> > > > With Don's extension of CTFE and Kenji proposal it's possible to fully > implement macroses in library. I've tried to do that earlier but it was > impossible with current compiler state. I think it's GREAT idea. Thank Kenji > for making it. I'm interested in implementing such macro library. Are there > any instructions how to compile DMD under windows? > > >