On 7/12/2011 7:14 PM, bcs wrote: > == Quote from Adam D. Ruppe (destructiona...@gmail.com)'s article >> I'd like to point out that *normal code* in Phobos is losing >> functionality far too often too, like replace() no longer working >> on immutable strings as of the last release. >> Generalized templates are great, but not at the cost of existing >> functionality! > > The answer to both problems is to have a test suit that is very easy > for the average user to add code to that's run along with the current > auto-tester. What I'm thinking of is somthing like codepad.org where > anyone can submit a code sample and where "interested parties" get informed > when the results for them change. With that in place, when > some one hits a regression it can be added to the (or a) regression > suit with just a few clicks. With a bit more work, you could even let > people "go back in time" and show that a test case user to run. > > Heck, I was looking into building exactly that a few months back but > real life got in the way.
Why separate at all? Add tests to phobos directly like any other unit test.