"bcs" <b...@example.com> wrote in message news:iviv9h$2ee$1...@digitalmars.com... > == Quote from Andrej Mitrovic (andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com)'s article >> Last time I brought this issue up in bugzilla it was shot down with >> "We don't guarantee and don't have to guarantee functions will > always >> be CTFE-able between releases". > > Maybe there should be a std.ctfe.* that looks a bit like std.* that IS > guaranteed to work. Ideally it would be nothing but a bunch of alias. >
If we do that we may as well just stick their bodies inside the original function in an if(_ctfe) block.
