Since the details of many of these functions have changed, is it really a good idea to make the depricated names aliases of the new functions? If anyone has code that relies on the screwy old behavior (such as trying to compensate for their problems) then that code will silently break.
- Re: Next in Review Queue: The New std.path bearophile
- Re: Next in Review Queue: The New std.path KennyTM~
- Re: Next in Review Queue: The New std.path Nick Sabalausky
- Re: Next in Review Queue: The New std.path Jacob Carlborg
- Re: Next in Review Queue: The New std.path Lars T. Kyllingstad
- Re: Next in Review Queue: The New std.path Nick Sabalausky
- Re: Next in Review Queue: The New std.path Lars T. Kyllingstad
- Re: Next in Review Queue: The New std.path Nick Sabalausky
- Re: Next in Review Queue: The New std.pa... Lars T. Kyllingstad
- Re: Next in Review Queue: The New std.path Nick Sabalausky
- Re: Next in Review Queue: The New std.path Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Next in Review Queue: The New std.path Lars T. Kyllingstad
- Re: Next in Review Queue: The New std.path Vladimir Panteleev
- Re: Next in Review Queue: The New std.path Andrej Mitrovic
- Re: Next in Review Queue: The New std.path Lars T. Kyllingstad
- Re: Next in Review Queue: The New std.path Vladimir Panteleev
- Re: Next in Review Queue: The New std.pa... Lars T. Kyllingstad
- Re: Next in Review Queue: The New std.path Nick Sabalausky
- Re: Next in Review Queue: The New std.path Lars T. Kyllingstad
- Re: Next in Review Queue: The New std.pa... Vladimir Panteleev