On Friday 15 July 2011 23:48:39 KennyTM~ wrote: > On Jul 15, 11 23:26, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote: > >> > So here you have had to use Unqual > >> > immutable(Unqual!C1)[] setExtension(C1, C2)(in C1[] path, in > >> > C2[] ext) immutable(Unqual!C1)[] defaultExtension(C1, C2)(in > >> > C1[] path, in C2[] ext) > >> > > >> > Instead of Unqual isn't it nicer to use a Deconst!() template? > > > > Hmm, I guess you're right. "shared" shouldn't be stripped, for > > instance. > > Given that immutable( const(char) ) == immutable(char), I think the > Unqual! should simply be removed.
I'd still put the Unqual in there. Perhaps it's due to compiler bugs, but from what I've seen, it can get kind of funny when you try and have an immutable const or a const immutable. Using Unqual makes it very clear what you mean. - Jonathan M Davis