On 08/29/2011 06:30 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 29-08-2011 18:15, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 8/29/11, kennytm<kenn...@gmail.com> wrote:
On the pattern matching syntax for templates in the comments -- Sigh,
the
spec gotta advertise this valid syntax in the operator overloading page
more:
Foo opBinary(string op:"+")(...) { ... }
Wow I didn't know about this. So now I can do this:
enum Foo
{
A,
B
}
void test(Foo foo:Foo.A)() {}
instead of the more verbose:
void test(Foo foo)()
if (foo == Foo.A)
{}
Can it be used for overloading? I assume the way it works in that code
is that it only runs the function if foo equals Foo.A.
- Alex
Yes:
void test(Foo foo)() {} // handles Foo.A
void test(Foo foo:Foo.B)() {} // handles Foo.B
