On 08/29/2011 07:44 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:55:56 +0200, Andrej Mitrovic
<andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com> wrote:
Oh man wouldn't it be cool if we could use this syntax like this:
void test(R1:isInputRange, R2:isForwardRange)(R1 r1, R2 r2) {}
I'm not sure how that would work with multiple constraints or
constraints that need comparisons, e.g. ElementType:
void test(R1:isInputRange && ElementType == int, R2:isForwardRange)() {}
Just throwing ideas for D5 there.. lol.
Well, can you come up with a useful syntax for
void put(E, R)(R r, E e) if(is(E : ElementType!R)) {}
et.al.
Otherwise having another syntax which put the sometimes heavy template
constraints on the exact opposite
side of the function signature is not too tempting.
void put(E: ElementType!R, R)(R r, E e) {}
