On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:30:42 -0400, Timon Gehr <timon.g...@gmx.ch> wrote:
On 08/30/2011 07:50 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
We could find cases like this all day.
Make I a class, and this problem also occurs.
Without the compiler having access to the *changes* it cannot be perfect
in detecting refactoring errors.
-Steve
Chances are that it will detect more errors if "override" actually means
override.
Is it just the name? What if it was implement? or override_or_implement?
Would that make it "detect more errors"?
I can't see how finding more bugs is a bad thing, regardless of what the
name of the keyword is.
-Steve
