On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:16:58 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
<schvei...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:06:02 -0400, Timon Gehr <timon.g...@gmx.ch> wrote:
I don't think that you can change a widely used interface into an
abstract class and not introduce annoyances much larger than override
is capable of creating.
interface I
{
int foo();
void bar();
}
->
interface _I
{
int foo();
void bar();
}
abstract class I : _I
{
int foo() { return 0; }
}
That was kind of weird, I guess I should have done:
interface I
{
int foo();
void bar();
}
->
abstract class I
{
int foo() { return 0; }
void bar();
}
-Steve