Mafi Wrote: > > Along these same lines I'm wondering why not simply call this new module > > std.io <http://std.io> rather than use the existing name std.stdio? > > It'd avoid the code breaking issue and help reflect that this new > > module isn't based around C's stdio FILE (at least that's what I > > gather). Also, the code is written from scratch so that's another > > reason for why I don't think it should have the same name. The only > > reason I can think of is if it provided significant improvements over > > the existing std.stdio without causing massive breakage. > > > > Regards, > > Brad Anderson > > I think this is a good idea. I think std.io sounds and feels much better. > > Mafi
I think this is a terrific suggestion. Paul
