"Christophe" <trav...@phare.normalesup.org> wrote in message news:j6ho92$gtr$1...@digitalmars.com... > > Well, too much parametrization is wrong. But the posix way has to be > supported, and it includes "-o output" (which is much more helpful than > -ooutput for readability and for auto-completion in the shell). >
Both of those always seemed goofy to me. "-o=output" and "-o:output" are the only ones that ever made much sense to me. (FWIW)
