On 10/11/11 4:00 PM, Johann MacDonagh wrote:
On 10/11/2011 1:57 AM, Piotr Szturmaj wrote:
Johann MacDonagh wrote:
Maybe "Database" should be an abstract class rather than an interface?
That's how ADO.net does it:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.data.sqlclient.sqlconnection.aspx
Why "Database" instead of PGConnection, MySqlConnection,
SQLiteConnection, etc. ? And of course base SqlConnection.
No, I agree. The base type should be DbConnection (I dunno,
SqlConnection is a little too specific, I like DbConnection better),
extended by PGConnection, MySqlConnection, SqliteConnection, etc...
The database engine should be codified in the connection string, not in
the type name.
Andrei
