Seems like a horrible assumption to make when inventing a systems programming language that intends to go head to head with C/C++ :)
On 30 October 2011 03:51, Alex Rønne Petersen <xtzgzo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 30-10-2011 02:49, Manu wrote: > >> What's the deal with core.cpuid? >> I realise it is an x86 opcode, but is that something that you really >> want totally bare in core like that? >> I'm experimenting with other architectures, and some sort of >> core.processorInfo would be really nice, surely an API for this stuff >> should be more generalised...? >> > > That module was probably designed around the assumption that D would never > run on !x86 architectures, which is clearly not the case with GDC > existing... > > - Alex >
