Le 31/10/2011 02:21, Mehrdad a écrit :
I've written this piece of code a fair number of times:static if (is(typeof(foo()))) { foo(); } else { bar(); } When the expression inside the condition (i.e. the call to foo()) gets complicated, you get lots of code duplication and things become harder to read. So I'm thinking, why not just introduce a 'static try'? Something like: static try { foo(); } catch // (string ex) // perhaps let them know what the error is? { bar(); } It's a clean and immensely readable improvement IMO, and it doesn't introduce any new keywords or any breaking changes to anything. How's the idea?
That sound dangerous. You can get some compile error and not notice it.
