Jose Armando Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Nick Sabalausky <a@a.a> wrote:
>> "Martin Nowak" <d...@dawgfoto.de> wrote in message
>> news:mailman.631.1320245247.24802.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
>>> The main point is that git offers a lean mental model.
>>>
>>> http://book.git-scm.com/1_the_git_object_model.html
>>> http://book.git-scm.com/7_the_packfile.html
>>>
>>> IMHO a complete understanding/control of what is happening scales much
>>> better
>>> than a fleshed out abstraction that hangs in the air.
>> OTOH, Git pretty much expects you to understand that under-the-hood stuff
>> for any of it to even make sense in the first place ("hard, soft, hard and
>> soft, index, blah, blah, blah, WTF just undo the gorram commit, damnnit!").
>> Hg you can pretty much just pick up and go.
> 
> Thats like trying to successfully write an application that uses an
> SQL database application without knowing SQL, database theory, etc.
> 
> Thats like trying to successfully write a networked application
> without knowing how IP, TCP, UDP, etc work.
> 
> Thats like trying to successfully write a D program without knowing
> how the language works.
> 
> Thats like trying to successfully write a computer software without
> knowing how a computer works.

        That's like not knowing how IP, TCP, UDP, etc work to use a web
browser...

                Jerome
-- 
mailto:jeber...@free.fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeber...@jabber.fr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to