> > Do I understand it right, that "sacred history problem" is a problem only > > for git due to how it implements merges? > > > > Also if you can always fast forward the main branch, does it mean the > > project is small, i.e. ~1 man is working on it? > > No, Git is probably the DVCS with *least* sacred history (read: nothing > is sacred).
I meant, sacred history would be a problem only in git and is not a problem for other DVCSes where merges are done properly.
