bcs Wrote: > You must have miss-spoke. I assume your intended to say organised and > grouped instead of an insane interleaved view where the conversation's > natural structure is mashed flat and destroyed.
I've *never* had a conversation in real life where time branched out. The closest you can come in real life is if a group splinters, and instead of a public forum, you have a bunch of private conversations that just happen to take place in the same room. > Oh wait, that would have looked the same to you.) Yeah. I use the email gateway for reading, and skim posts in real time as they arrive in my inbox (which can be sorted in a variety of ways, but I usually keep it on strict linear, oldest first.) It's pretty rare that I look at the in-reply-to header at all. It serves almost no purpose.
